The BlockBriefing Investigations Desk examines technical incidents, company disclosures, token-governance failures and security claims through accessible primary evidence. We distinguish confirmed records, attributed allegations and our own analysis.
The $4.85 Million Vote
How a governance mechanism came under pressure, what public transaction traces can and cannot establish, and why the control design matters.
Keystone’s 180-day promise
Examines different statements about customer-data retention and the questions raised after the reported breach.
CoinDCX legacy wallet activity
A transaction-focused review of reported legacy-wallet deposit handling and why observed flows require careful interpretation.
Mezo exploit questions
An examination of contract authorization, related audits, and the limits of what published evidence proves.
Our verification framework
Investigations should include direct access to relevant blockchain transactions, protocol source code, audits, regulatory records, company documents or properly attributed firsthand material wherever lawful and available. Wallet attribution and allegations must not be treated as confirmed facts without adequate evidence. Affected parties should have a meaningful opportunity to respond. We preserve material corrections and disclose conflicts of interest.
Send a tip or correction
Readers can contact the newsroom. Do not submit passwords, private keys, confidential personal records or unlawfully obtained materials through a public form. For fact corrections, include the article URL and independently checkable documents.